Be The Bull
You are driving. It’s been a long day.
You begin feeling disconnected. You need a quick boost. Who
knows how long the coffee has been sitting there. It could be
stale. Have that rot gut taste. You want something tastier.
Something with a quicker punch. The exits are
miles apart. You try to concentrate while driving. One mile to
go. Licking your lips with anticipation. You walk. A zombie-like stagger. Into the
store. Your eyes quickly scan the coolers. Soft drinks.
Bottled coffee. Water. Suddenly, a slim silver and blue can
with a red bull catches your eye. You slam it down before you
get to the counter. You snap out of your haze. Red Bull.
It is the energy boosting drink. Imagine walking
the streets of London. Sidewalk café tables and trashcans have
the slim silver and blue cans on and in them. And customers did
not place them there. You don’t know what the can could hold.
You see it in a store. You try it. Red Bull. It has managed
to stake its claim with a sense of rebellion…creating a
cult-like status through the underground. And that’s just how
it unveiled its product in London. Without a marketing budget. Red Bull now has
a marketing budget. About a $900 million marketing budget. And
it is rarely if ever spent on conventional marketing.
Red Bull has
become a lifestyle product via its connection to entertainment.
Entertainment created by sports. And that connection costs
about one-third of Red Bull’s marketing budget. Rather than
sponsoring sporting events or teams Red Bull owns them.
The most costly – a two-car Formula 1 racing team. A team that
purchases Ferrari engines without sponsorship obligations. The
owner is the sponsor. And that creates money to go elsewhere. Elsewhere is
America. Red Bull does not have the perceived impact. Yet.
Conquering the American beverage market is its quest. Last March, the Major League
Soccer team known as the New York MetroStars became the New York
Red Bulls. And when you watch the Daytona 500 in a couple of
weeks (February 18) you will see something you haven’t seen
before. Red Bull owns a two-car NASCAR team. It normally costs
the primary sponsor of one stock car about $15 million to $20
million per year. And there are lots of secondary sponsors that
also generate revenue… not seen on the Red Bull cars.
The cost of
owning a stock car -- with the owner as the sponsor -- who
knows. And Red Bull founder Dietrich Mateschitz won’t
tell you. But Mike Bartelli, Senior Vice President /
Motorsports at Millisport, will tell you the impact. “It’s not
just the fact that they’ll own the team as a sponsor, but their
marketing approach is certainly going to be different.” Like
having one car numbered 83. Funny, there are 8.3 ounces in a
can of Red Bull. That’s different. Formula 1 driver
David Coulthard goes through the S curves around the
world. “When you’re driving for a team like Mercedes, you
represent DaimlerChrysler; you represent Mobil; you represent
Hugo Boss. You have to walk a fine line of what is
politically correct for each sponsor.” Red Bull NASCAR driver Brian
Vickers shifts into high gear on the ovals. “When the
sponsor owns the team, the dynamic is a little bit different.
They don’t have to answer to anybody. The owner and sponsor are
one in the same.” There’s that
word different again. Radio needs to be
different. Red Bull’s
self-owned venture into entertainment is its marketing vehicle.
Radio is a marketing vehicle for products and brands… not
necessarily itself. Red Bull generates profit by selling its
product. Radio generates profit by selling its time… and needs
to create more from its new platforms. Red Bull is consumed 8.3
ounces at a time. Radio -- along with its sponsors -- is
consumed in time. Diminishing time. Can radio be its
own marketing vehicle? Marketing to its two consumers --
listeners and sponsors. A $900 million per year marketing
budget is not available… in a station… in a cluster… in a
company. Maybe as a total product… a substantial amount funded
by all that create the total product. And this is
where radio needs to turn into its own marketing vehicle.
Aggressively. Not using its time. But investing in time… and
space… and products. Delivering its product… entertainment or
information… not just time wrapped around sponsorship time.
Sports entertainment has fans. So does radio. And creating
awareness and strengthening the relationship makes fans bigger
fans. It needs to be done in every way… every day.
Radio needs
real money -- not just promoting via the airwaves.
Real money spent on marketing to consumers… listeners. The value
of all available platforms… how to access radio… via integration
into the platforms. Sports
entertainment has customers. So does radio. Unlike Red Bull,
radio must have support sponsor stickers all over its vehicle.
And use the stickers to generate a substantial marketing
budget. To market to entertainment or information consumers. The NAB just
invested $1,166,380 in 2006 election contributions… to
candidates. Shouldn’t the NAB invest that money in attracting
sponsorship candidates. A CES-like confab for time consumers…
heads of product or agency marketing divisions. It is an
unconventional way… it puts stickers on the vehicle. And it
generates real money… for marketing… to consumers.
Radio. It needs
to get the vehicle on the track. Racing for fans. It creates
more than exposure. It creates control… of radio’s destiny.
916 words. That’s a lot of thought -- a
lot of typing. Time for an energy boost. Time for some
entertainment. The first brand is a clear choice. The second
brand… be a bull to make radio the clear choice. Need help being the bull? Greg
Gillispie is an idea booster. Reach him at 703-678-9460 or
ggillispie@aol.com.
Greg
Gillispie’s 33+ year career includes consulting media and artist
management companies, programming radio stations in Omaha,
Pittsburgh, and Washington, DC, contracting for XM Radio,
developing revenue-generating marketing and promotion campaigns
for a variety of entertainment companies, moderating and
speaking at multi-media conferences, on-air work, and training
the Playmate Radio Team. Greg is author of a number of
published articles and co-author of the textbook Process and
Practice of Radio Programming. |
|||||||










